Denouement
Robert Pape, University of Chicago political science professor, wrote an op-ed in the New York Times a few days ago, titled The War Is Turning Iran Into a Major World Power. Last month he told us about the Escalation Trap, the danger that leaders who start wars get drawn into expanding them as circumstances don't go according to plan. Today it is reported that China is sending weapons to Iran. The plot thickens. The game is afoot. Meanwhile, Trump's wife is "throwing him under the bus," reviving his likely reason for starting the war - the Epstein Files. Rex Huppke of USA Today pointed out that she only defends herself, not Donald. It could be that the rats are deserting the ship.
No one could have predicted that the American empire would end this way. It has been a long time coming, starting well before I was born, and accelerating during my nearly eighty-one years of life. For a little context, the words of former Marine General Smedley Butler explains amply in his landmark book War Is a Racket, published in 1935. Here's an excerpt:
War is just a racket. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of people. Only a small inside group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few at the expense of the masses.
I believe in adequate defense at the coastline and nothing else. If a nation comes over here to fight, then we’ll fight. The trouble with America is that when the dollar only 6 percent over here, then it gets restless and goes overseas to get 100 percent. Then the flag follows the dollar and the soldiers follow the flag.
I wouldn’t go to war again as I have done to protect some lousy investment of the bankers. There are only two things we should fight for. One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a racket.
There isn’t a trick in the racketeering bag that the military gang is blind to. It has its "finger men" to point out enemies, its "muscle men" to destroy enemies, its "brain men" to plan war preparations, and a "Big Boss" Super-Nationalistic-Capitalism.
It may seem odd for me, a military man, to adopt such a comparison. Truthfulness compels me to. I spent thirty-three years and four months in active military service as a member of this country’s most agile military force, the Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from Second Lieutenant to Major General. And during that period, I spent most of my time I spent most of my time being a high-class muscle-man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the Bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism.
I suspected I was just part of a racket at the time. Now I am sure of it. Like all the members of the military profession, I never had a thought of my own until I left the service. My mental faculties remained in suspended animation while I obeyed the orders of higher-ups. This is typical of everyone in the military service.
I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China I helped to see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested.
During those years, I had, as the boys in the back room would say, a swell racket. Looking back on it, feel that I could have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents.
Highly recommended reading on Smedley Butler’s life: The Plot to Seize the White House, by Jules Archer (out of print, but available in better public libraries).
___________________________________
To show how successful empire propaganda is in the U.S., the "Democratic" governor of Wisconsin recently signed a bill making criticism of the state of Israel a crime. I wrote to the governor, Tony Evers, challenging his nasty decision. I haven't received a reply yet. Here' what I wrote:
From: John Hamilton
To: Governor Tony Evers (https://wi.accessgov.com/public/Forms/Edit/governor/879053df-1ad1-451e-b2fd-1932bcacb873/2)
Date: April 3, 2026
Subject: Wisconsin Act 143
Hello Governor Evers
I voted for you twice, and wrote in praise of you a time or two, such as here.
I see you signed the Republican bill making criticism of Israel a crime. I hereby state that Israel is a genocide state, sponsored by the U.S. Federal Government, and now you. I am now a criminal, at least until this phony law is found to be unconstitutional by both the state and U.S. Supreme Courts. For you, of course, this will be a sad part of your legacy. For me, wartime veteran of the U.S. Army, saying a genocide state is a genocide state is part of my legacy. History will not remember me, but it will remember you.
___________________________________
I had written the following to the state Senate in January, hoping it would deter them in their zeal to enact this phony law:
Wisconsin State Senate
P. O. BOX 7882, MADISON, WI 53707-7882
To The Entire Senate
Word has reached me that you are considering a bill to make "antisemitism" illegal. There are some things you might want to consider when studying this legislation. First, you might want to define what is meant by the word Semite. A definition from Wikipedia will suffice: Semitic people or Semites is a term for an ethnic, cultural or racial group associated with people of the Middle East and the Horn of Africa, Including Akkadians (Assyrians and Babylonians), Arabs, Arameans, Canaanites (Ammonites, Edomites, Israelites, Moabites, Phoenicians, and Philistines) and Habesha peoples. The terminology is now largely unused outside the grouping "Semitic languages" in linguistics. First used in the 1770s by members of the Göttingen school of history, this biblical terminology for race was derived from Shem (שֵׁם), one of the three sons of Noah in the Book of Genesis, together with the parallel terms Hamites and Japhetitites.
In archaeology, the term is sometimes used informally as "a kind of shorthand" for ancient Semitic-speaking peoples. Identification of pro-Caucasian racism has either partially or completely devalued the use of the term as a racial category, with the caveat that an inverse assessment would still be considered scientifically obsolete.
Once you understand what is meant by Semite, you might also want to define what is meant by anti-Semite. It is a loaded term, but the legislation is intended to expand the meaning to criticism of Israel’s genocide in Gaza and the West Bank of Palestine. If you vote to enact such legislation you will make genocide the official policy of the State of Wisconsin.
John Hamilton
Madison
___________________________________
___________________________________
Update, April 13:
As I have written before, the president of the United States is criminally insane.
There were some very pertinent discussions on public radio today, starting with this program on the constitutional powers of the president on Wisconsin Public Radio.
















































