An Ethical Choice
The excitement has died down a bit since the convention. Harris is a pretty boring speaker, and is annoyingly vague on what she will do as president, her economic plan so far something like the age old promises of a chicken in every pot and happy days are here again. She says she wants to incentivize entrepreneurship, a good crowd-pleaser, even has a slogan: Opportunity Economy. She also promises to crack down harder on illegal immigration, a non-answer that does nothing to address the problem, just making life harder for the many who are fleeing violence and poverty. Conspicuous in its absence is any meaningful mention of climate change.
Worst of all, though, is that she stands firm with Joe Biden in supporting the ongoing genocide in Gaza. Genocide is the systematic, planned extermination of an entire national, racial, political or ethnic group. This is exactly what the government of the state of Israel is doing to the Palestinian people, first in Gaza, but now extending to the West Bank of the Jordan River. This campaign is done with funding, weapons, including 2000 pound bombs, and diplomatic support from the government of the United States, presided over by Joseph Biden, and now fully supported by his vice president Kamala Harris.
At last month’s Democratic Convention Palestinians were denied the opportunity to present their case for ending this support, in spite of having many elected delegates being told they would be able to speak. Instead, the event’s choreographers chose to keep them off the stage, but paraded the parents of Hamas hostage Hersh Goldberg-Polin in front of the crowd, effectively playing to their support from AIPAC. I wonder how these manipulators feel now that Hersh has been killed. They likely don’t care. It worked when they needed it to work, and now it’s on to other things.
This presents a quandary for me, and likely for millions of others. Should I vote for a candidate who supports genocide, or find some third party or independent candidate to give my meaningless vote to? I don’t like any of the alternate candidates, and won’t vote for genocide, so my only real option is to cast my meaningless vote creatively.
Earlier this year I called Wisconsin U.S. senator Tammy Baldwin’s local office to implore her to call for a ceasefire in Gaza. She of course was not there, and the phone person I talked to said he would pass my comments on to the senator. I told him I was going to vote for Alfred E. Neuman for senator in the upcoming election. Alfred E. Neuman, the Mad Magazine character known for saying only "What, me Worry?," doesn’t exist, but I prefer someone imaginary and therefore incapable of supporting genocide to someone who does exist and supports genocide. In the recent primary election I did write-in Alfred E. Neuman for Senate.
I can vote for Alfred E. Neuman for president too. The first time I voted for president was 1968, for Hubert Humphrey, Democrat. It was either him or Richard Nixon. I chose the lesser of two evils. I had been in Army basic training during the Democratic Convention in Chicago that summer, and was not happy with what happened there, and the choice I was faced with on my first time voting for president. Since then I have voted for the lesser of two evils numerous times, though not always. I voted for Ralph Nader in 1996 and 2000. I actually campaigned for Hillary Clinton in 2016, covering a complete "turf" for her by myself, double-debasing myself by working to elect and voting for the lesser of two evils. I forgive myself. The alternative was Donald Trump.
I won’t make that mistake this time. Kamala Harris cynically chose to deny a Palestinian voice at the convention, making the arrogant assumption that those who voted uncommitted or uninstructed in primaries would fall into line in November, having no choice but her or Trump. I don’t like being played. I still believe Donald Trump won’t be the “Republican” candidate by November 5, exiting due to health problems, so his flunkies will have to come up with another sociopath. Hmm. Who might that be? Who could be more diabolical than Trump? Arkansas senator Tom Cotton.
____________________________________________
This madness won't last, and it will ultimately fail, for several reasons. One of course is that the world is waking up. More important, though, is sustainability. Israel needs to be able to feed at the trough of American largesse, and that largesse is about to turn into parsimony. The unsustainable infinite-growth U.S. economy is about to experience finitude. It has been running on fumes for decades, but just as you can't squeeze blood out of a turnip, you can only squeeze resources out of Planet Earth for so long, and then no more.
Finitude of resources in tandem with climate change means it is all over now, baby blue, just in time for the presidential election. It may take a while longer, but all the king's AIPACs and all the king's guns will not put the Humpty Dumpty of this evil crime syndicate together again.
This calls for a song. Of course, when you are God's chosen people, no worry. "He" is on your side. We'll see.
_____________________________________________
And, putting it in the broadest context, this madness is happening in the context of ever-worsening climate change. Practicing genocide when planetary civilization is under existential threat is beyond stupidity, and is a luxury that is doomed to failure. Genocide transforms to suicide.
I went to see a concert by Jimmie Dale Gilmore and Dave Alvin a few days ago. They encored with this song. It was much better live, pretty incredible. This is what it was like. This song was their second encore. This was their third encore. Here's Jimmie Dale Gilmore in The Big Lebowski. Here's the original of Get Together. The first time I ever heard Jimmie Dale Gilmore was in 1994, when this cover of a Johnny Cash song was played on the radio. Bob Dylan did a version of Train of Love in 1999. And, of course, the Johnny Cash original. Here's Jimmie Dale Gilmore doing my favorite Grateful Dead song. I think I might be right where I belong.
_____________________________________
Update, September 21: California university professors are starting to fight back against suppression of free speech. Maybe we'll find out who the thugs were who attacked students with clubs and pipes at UCLA last May. Former members of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have become students at American Universities. In a Venn diagram sense, I wonder what the intersect is of IDF and violence at U.S. campuses might be.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home